Provisional Spoil Management for Lunar Excavations

Strategies and Technologies for Sustainable Surface Operations and In-Situ Resource Utilization

Abstract

This technical white paper presents a structured framework for spoil management in lunar excavations, addressing the geotechnical, environmental, and operational challenges of handling lunar regolith to support sustainable surface operations and In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU). Lunar regolith, formed by micrometeorite impacts, is classified into five distinct zones (L1–L5) by de Moraes (2025, SpaceGeotech.org): L1 (0–0.3 m, loose), L2 (0.3–1.5 m, partially compacted), L3 (1.5–3 m, compacted), L4 (3–5 m, dense), and L5 (>5 m, bedrock-like). While prior studies have focused primarily on the loose L1 surface layer, effective spoil management must address the full stratigraphy due to significant variations in particle size (0.01–1 mm), cohesion (0–>5 kPa), density (1.3–2.0 g/cm³), and abrasiveness (CAI 2–4). These properties critically influence excavation, transport, storage, and utilization under lunar gravity (1.62 m/s²), vacuum (10⁻¹² Pa), and extreme temperatures (-173°C to 127°C).

This work evaluates spoil management strategies through the adaptation of terrestrial mining and tunneling practices, referencing the SME Mining Engineering Handbook (3rd Edition) for excavation methodologies and the International Tunnelling Association’s Guidelines for Tunnelling Risk Management for risk frameworks. Case studies from Tunneling & Underground Construction Magazine inform approaches to dust control and containment within lunar constraints. Key focus areas include geotechnical analysis of regolith layers, environmental impacts on spoil handling, and ISRU applications such as regolith-based construction and resource extraction (e.g., water from L3–L4 icy regolith). Particular emphasis is given to stockpile design, addressing stability under low gravity (slopes <30° for L1–L2, up to 40° for L4–L5), containment systems (abrasion-resistant bags, sintered barriers), and dust mitigation (electrostatic systems).

The methodology integrates peer-reviewed literature, experimental data on regolith simulants, and terrestrial analogs to establish performance metrics, including excavation efficiency (m³/kWh), dust mitigation effectiveness, and material utilization rates. Technologies assessed include discrete and continuous excavators, pneumatic conveyors, and robotic systems, tailored to L1–L5 layers. Challenges include equipment wear, volatile loss in vacuum, and scalability for large-scale operations, with future directions outlined for standardized testing and automation. Stockpile design is treated as a core principle throughout, ensuring stability and resource preservation.

The findings affirm that effective spoil management is critical to enabling lunar habitat construction, dust hazard mitigation, and long-term exploration goals. Recommendations include the adoption of modular excavation systems, wear-resistant materials, and reinforced stockpile structures, drawing on terrestrial tunneling experience. The paper concludes with a research roadmap emphasizing site-specific geotechnical investigations, particularly for L4 and L5 layers, as a foundation for sustainable lunar infrastructure development.

1. Introduction

Significance of Spoil Management in Lunar Exploration

The successful exploration and development of the lunar surface require robust, systematic strategies for managing excavation spoil — a fundamental component of sustainable surface operations and In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU). Lunar regolith, a fragmented layer produced by continuous micrometeorite impacts, presents distinct geotechnical challenges due to its fine particle size, low cohesion, and high abrasiveness, further compounded by the lunar environment’s unique conditions.

Historically, most studies have concentrated on the loose surface layer (L1), yet effective spoil management requires comprehensive consideration of deeper regolith zones, as classified by de Moraes (2025, SpaceGeotech.org):

• L1 (0-0.3 m)

• L2 (0.3-1.5 m)

• L3 (1.5-3 m)

• L4 (5-5 m)

• L5 (>5 m)

These layers exhibit significant variations in bulk density (1.3–2.0 g/cm³), cohesion (0–>5 kPa), and structural behavior, directly influencing excavation methods, material handling, storage, and potential resource extraction pathways.

This paper addresses the necessity of a systematic spoil management framework to support the development of lunar infrastructure, including habitats, roads, and ISRU processes for water and oxygen extraction from icy regolith in L3 and L4. Given the absence of terrestrial analogs for lunar conditions, this work adapts established mining and tunneling practices from Earth. References include the SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Third Edition (Darling, 2011) for excavation and geotechnical principles, and the International Tunnelling Association’s Guidelines for Tunnelling Risk Management (Report No. 26, 2022) for advanced strategies in spoil handling and dust mitigation, drawing parallels to projects such as the Second Avenue Subway and OARS Tunnel. Additional insights are drawn from Tunneling & Underground Construction Magazine, informing equipment design and containment measures.

The primary objective is to establish a framework that optimizes spoil management across all regolith layers, with specific attention to stockpile design for stability and resource preservation under lunar gravity. Addressed challenges include equipment wear, dust hazards, and volatile loss — each necessitating innovative solutions such as modular excavation systems, abrasion-resistant materials, and electrostatic dust mitigation. This work synthesizes peer-reviewed literature, experimental data, and terrestrial analogs to propose performance metrics, including excavation efficiency (m³/kWh) and dust mitigation effectiveness, tailored to lunar constraints. Future research priorities include site-specific geotechnical investigations, particularly for the deeper L4 and L5 horizons, to refine these strategies.

Ultimately, this paper underscores spoil management as a cornerstone of lunar infrastructure development, supporting sustainable operations and enabling a long-term human presence on the Moon. The following sections examine regolith properties, environmental constraints, and spoil management strategies, providing a practical roadmap for implementation.

2. Geotechnical Properties of Lunar Regolith

The geotechnical properties of lunar regolith are fundamental to effective spoil management for excavation activities on the Moon. These properties directly influence the selection of excavation techniques, dust control measures, equipment design, and stockpile stability strategies. Lunar regolith, a fragmented layer formed by continuous micrometeorite bombardment, is classified into five zones by de Moraes (2025, SpaceGeotech.org):

• L1 (0-0.3 m): Loose surface

• L2 (0.3-1.5 m): Partially compacted

• L3 (1.5-3 m): Compacted

• L4 (3-5 m): Dense

• L5 (>5 m): Bedrock-like

While existing research has largely concentrated on the loose, unconsolidated L1 layer, effective spoil management must account for the deeper L2–L5 horizons, which exhibit distinct physical characteristics that affect excavation and handling operations. These variations include:

• Particle size: 0.01-1 mm

• Cohesion: 0- >5 kPa

• Bulk density: 1.3-2.0 g/cm³

• Abrasiveness: CAI 2-4

These properties vary with depth and regional location and are further complicated by the lunar environment’s low gravity (1.62 m/s²) and high vacuum (10⁻¹² Pa). Together, they present unique engineering challenges not encountered in terrestrial conditions.

This section analyzes the geotechnical characteristics of each regolith zone and their implications for spoil management. The analysis draws on terrestrial analogs and best practices from the SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Third Edition (Darling, 2011) and recent literature in geotechnical and tunneling engineering, adapting these insights to the context of lunar operations.

2.1 Particle Size, Morphology, and Cohesion Characteristics

Lunar regolith consists of fine, angular particles ranging from 0.01 to 1 mm in size, with particle size distribution varying across the stratigraphic zones defined by de Moraes (2025, SpaceGeotech.org).

• L1 (0–0.3 m) is dominated by ultra-fine particles (<0.1 mm), comprising approximately 60% of its composition. This fine fraction accounts for L1’s characteristic “fluffy” behavior and its low cohesion (0–0.5 kPa), a condition driven by the absence of water and atmospheric pressure.

• L2 (0.3–1.5 m) and L3 (1.5–3 m) exhibit a progressive shift toward coarser fractions (0.1–1 mm), accompanied by increased cohesion (0.5–2 kPa) as a result of partial compaction with depth.

• L4 (3–5 m) and L5 (>5 m) present the highest cohesion values (>2 kPa), indicative of further compaction or proximity to bedrock-like materials.

The angular morphology, primarily composed of glassy fragments, increases interparticle friction, which enhances regolith stability at rest but simultaneously raises excavation resistance and exacerbates dust generation, particularly in L1.

From a spoil management perspective:

• L1’s fine-grained material requires robust dust control systems, such as enclosed excavators and containment strategies.

• L2–L5’s coarser and more cohesive materials necessitate excavation tools adapted for increased cutting resistance and compaction.

The accompanying chart (Figure 2.1) illustrates the particle size distribution trends across L1 to L3 based on de Moraes’ framework, with L4 and L5 projected to follow similar trends in the absence of comprehensive data.

Figure 2.1 - The provisional particle size distribution across L1, L2, and L3 layers (de Moraes, 2025).

2.2 Depth Dependent Variations and Regional Differences

The de Moraes (2025, SpaceGeotech.org) zoning framework defines the lunar regolith layers by distinct geotechnical properties:

Layer	Depth (m)	Bulk Density (g/cm³)
L1	0–0.3	1.3
L2	0.3–1.5	1.5
L3	1.5–3	1.8
L4	3–5	~1.9
L5	>5	~2.0 or bedrock-like

• L1’s loose, low-density structure is highly prone to dust generation and presents minimal excavation resistance.

• L2–L3 exhibit increasing compaction and density, resulting in higher resistance to excavation but still manageable with adapted equipment.

• L4 and L5 possess higher density and cohesion, making them suitable for structural cuts but requiring heavy-duty excavation tools for penetration.

  
  

In polar regions, L3 and L4 may contain ice-rich regolith, potentially increasing cohesion up to 5 kPa. However, this also introduces risks of sublimation during spoil handling, particularly in vacuum conditions. Effective spoil management must account for these variations.

• Staged excavation techniques are recommended for transitioning through L2–L5 layers.

• Thermal insulation strategies are necessary for polar stockpiles to mitigate volatile loss.

It is essential emphasize the importance of site-specific testing to accurately identify layer transitions, which is critical for designing stable and reliable stockpiles at varying depths.

2.3 Abrasiveness and Implications for Equipment Design

Lunar regolith exhibits high abrasiveness, typically quantified by the Cerchar Abrasivity Index (CAI), ranging from 2 to 4 across the L1–L5 layers. Among these, L1’s fine particles pose the greatest wear risk due to their high surface area-to-volume ratio and angular morphology, which accelerates abrasion on exposed mechanical components.

The abrasive wear rate can be expressed by the simplified formula:

W = (k . F . S)/H

Where:

• W = Wear rate (volume loss per unit time or per cycle)

• 𝑘 = Wear coefficient (empirical, typically ~0.001 for hard abrasives)

• 𝐹 = Applied normal force (N)

• S = Sliding distance (m)

• H = Hardness of the worn material (Pa)

This relationship highlights the importance of selecting materials with high surface hardness, such as tungsten carbide coatings, to mitigate wear during L1 regolith handling.

For L2–L5, the coarser and denser regolith demands robust cutting tools derived from terrestrial tunneling practices, with reinforced edges to withstand higher abrasion forces.

Additionally, dust adhesion under vacuum conditions exacerbates maintenance challenges across all layers. To mitigate this, vibrational systems are recommended to prevent material buildup on equipment surfaces.

2.4 Lessons from Terrestrial Geotechnical Investigations and Stockpile Design

Terrestrial analogs provide valuable guidance for spoil management across lunar regolith layers L1–L5. This white paper advocates for applying shear strength analysis in stockpile design, considering cohesion (c) values ranging from 0 kPa for L1 to >2 kPa for L5 and friction angles (φ) between 30° and 40°. These parameters are critical for evaluating the stability of spoil piles under lunar gravity.

Under low gravity conditions, frictional resistance is reduced, increasing the risk of slumping, particularly for L1–L2. These layers require low-angle slopes (<30°) and additional containment measures. Conversely, L3–L5 stockpiles benefit from higher material cohesion and density but require reinforced containment systems to ensure long-term stability.

The ITA Report No. 26 (2022) emphasizes the importance of conveyor systems and storage facilities in managing large spoil volumes, providing solutions adaptable to lunar environments through the use of abrasion-resistant materials.

Stockpile Design Considerations:

Geometry:

• Slopes <30° for L1–L2

• Steeper slopes up to 40° permissible for L4–L5

Containment System:

• Abrasion-resistant bags for L1

• Sintered barriers for L3–L5

Dust Control:

• Electrostatic systems for L1

• Sealed covers for all layers to mitigate dust dispersion in vacuum environments

Layer	Depth (m)	Bulk Density (g/cm³)	Cohesion (kPa)	Abrasiveness (CAI)	Stockpile Design	Terrestrial Analog
L1	0-0.3	1.3	0-0.5	2-3	Low angle slopes, bags	Volcanic ash (SME)
L2	0.3-1.5	1.5	0.5-1	3-4	Containment, compaction	Loose soil (CIRIA P3155)
L3	1.5 -3	1.8	1-2	3-4	Reinforced barriers	Granular soil (SME)
L4	3 -5	1.9	2-5	3-4	Steeper slopes, stability	Hard rock (OneMine, I 75)
L5	>5	~2.0	>5	3-4	Deep containment, bedrock	Tunneling (OneMine)

Note: The stockpile considerations presented in the table are based on estimated lunar regolith properties derived from de Moraes (2025, Spacegeotech.org) and adapted from terrestrial analogs in the SME Mining Engineering Handbook (Darling 2011), ITA Report n°26 (2022), and other sources. Values for bulk density, cohesion, and abrasiveness are approximate, reflecting limited direct lunar data. Stockpile design recommendations assume uniform lunar conditions and may require adjustment based on site specific geotechnical investigations. Users are advised to validate these parameters through field testing prior to implementation.

3. Lunar Environmental Constraints

The lunar environment imposes unique constraints on spoil management practices, influencing excavation, transport, storage, and stockpile stability. These environmental factors amplify the challenges typically encountered in terrestrial operations and demand deliberate adaptation of established mining and tunneling practices.

These constraints necessitate the adaptation of terrestrial spoil management techniques, particularly from tunneling and mining operations in harsh environments. Practices involving enclosed conveyors, dust suppression systems, and thermal management strategies must be re-evaluated and modified for vacuum and reduced gravity conditions.

This section analyzes how these environmental factors impact spoil management systems and informs the selection of excavation methods, conveyance solutions, and storage strategies for lunar operations. The analysis draws on terrestrial engineering literature and case studies from mining and tunneling industries to guide adaptation for lunar applications.

3.1 Low Gravity and Its Effect on Excavation Mechanics

For stockpile management, reduced gravity diminishes frictional resistance between regolith particles, increasing the risk of material slumping, particularly in the L1 and L2 layers. To mitigate this, low-angle slopes (~30° or less) are recommended to maintain stockpile stability under these conditions.

Additionally, low gravity prolongs dust suspension, exacerbating contamination risks and reducing operational visibility. This is especially problematic with L1’s fine particles. As demonstrated in terrestrial projects, enclosed conveyors and dust mitigation systems are critical to containing and managing fine materials under these constraints.

3.2 High Vacuum and Particle Adhesion

The lunar vacuum (10⁻¹² Pa) amplifies Van der Waals forces, causing fine regolith particles, particularly from L1, to adhere to equipment surfaces and stockpiles. This increases maintenance requirements and complicates material handling. The SME Mining Engineering Handbook highlights similar adhesion challenges in terrestrial dry environments and recommends the use of vibrational or electrostatic systems to mitigate buildup, practices validated by the ITA Report No. 26 (2022, Section 5.3) for dust confinement in tunneling applications.

For spoil management, vacuum conditions also pose risks of volatile loss from ice-bearing regolith in L3–L4, necessitating sealed transport systems to preserve water and other volatiles critical for ISRU processes. To minimize dust dispersion and material degradation, stockpiles should be covered with abrasion-resistant materials specifically designed to withstand the mechanical and thermal stresses of the lunar environment.

Table 3.2 below summarizes vacuum related challenges and mitigation strategies:

Challenge	Impact on Spoil Management	Mitigation Strategy	Terrestrial Analog
Particle Adhesion	Clogs equipment, affects stockpile handling	Vibrational/electrostatic systems	Dry soil tunneling (SME)
Volatile Loss (L3 L4)	Sublimation of volatiles (H₂O, O₂)	Sealed transport, insulated containers	Gas mitigation practices
Dust Dispersion (L1)	Contaminates stockpiles, equipment	Enclosed conveyors, electrostatic curtains	Urban tunneling applications

3.3 Thermal Extremes and Equipment Thermal Management

Lunar temperature extremes significantly affect equipment performance and spoil handling operations. The SME Mining Engineering Handbook highlights the necessity of thermal management systems for mining equipment in harsh environments, recommending the use of radiative cooling solutions and insulated components to mitigate the effects of extreme thermal fluctuations.

For spoil management, these temperature variations pose a particular risk to ice-bearing regolith within L3–L4, where sublimation of volatiles may occur under prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures. To mitigate this, insulated storage systems are essential to preserve material integrity for future ISRU applications.

Additionally, stockpiles require shielding with reflective covers or other thermal protective measures to maintain temperature stability and minimize thermal cycling effects, which can contribute to both material degradation and structural instability over time.

3.4 Dust Hazards and Mitigation Strategies

Dust generated from L1 regolith, exacerbated by low gravity and vacuum conditions, presents significant risks to equipment functionality and stockpile stability. Fine particles can infiltrate mechanical systems, impair visibility, and degrade operational reliability.

The ITA Guidelines (2004) recommend the use of bow-tie risk analysis to systematically assess and mitigate dust hazards by identifying root causes, such as excavation disturbances, and implementing appropriate control measures.

While terrestrial tunneling projects typically rely on water sprays and ventilation to manage dust, such methods are impractical on the Moon due to the absence of atmosphere and limited water availability. Instead, lunar operations require dry mitigation technologies, including magnetic or electrostatic systems designed to capture and control fine particulate matter within excavation and handling environments.

4. Spoil Management Strategies

Effective spoil management on the lunar surface requires tailored strategies for excavation, conveyance, and storage, adapted from terrestrial practices to address the unique environmental and geotechnical conditions of the L1–L5 regolith layers (de Moraes, 2025, SpaceGeotech.org). These strategies account for the operational constraints imposed by low gravity, high vacuum, and pervasive dust hazards.

This section outlines provisional approaches for managing spoil across L1 (0–0.3 m), L2 (0.3–1.5 m), L3 (1.5–3 m), L4 (3–5 m), and L5 (>5 m), recognizing that these strategies are informed by terrestrial engineering knowledge and analogous industrial practices. Given the exploratory stage of lunar surface operations, all proposed methods remain subject to refinement and future validation through lunar field data.

4.1 Excavation Techniques and Conveyance System

Excavation Strategies

Effective excavation strategies must reflect the variable properties of lunar regolith across the L1–L5 layers, with equipment selection tailored to the specific geotechnical demands of each zone.

• L1–L2 (Loose to Partially Compacted Regolith):

These layers require lightweight, high-traction excavation systems capable of operating in low-gravity environments. Proposed solutions include bucket wheel excavators, adapted from terrestrial applications and equipped with magnetic anchoring or ballast systems to maintain traction on the lunar surface.

• L3–L5 (Compacted to Bedrock-Like Regolith):

Deeper layers present increased cohesion and density, requiring heavy-duty mechanical excavation tools capable of effective cutting and penetration. Rotary drilling systems, informed by terrestrial deep mining practices, offer a viable solution for L3–L4. L5 may necessitate specialized cutting tools designed for highly indurated or fractured materials.

Preliminary energy consumption estimates for excavation range from 0.5 kWh/m³ for L1 to approximately 2.0 kWh/m³ for L5, pending further validation through lunar field testing.

4.2 Conveyance Systems for Lunar Spoil Handling

Conveyance solutions must be fully mechanical, vacuum-compatible, and resilient to the abrasive and fine-grained nature of lunar regolith. Pneumatic and traditional belt systems are considered impractical under lunar vacuum due to atmospheric dependency, energy inefficiency, and material wear.

Recommended Mechanical Systems

Method	Throughput (m³/h)	Energy Use (kWh/m³)	Best Layers	Key Advantage	Key Limitation	Lunar Suitability
Screw Conveyor	40–70	0.3	L1–L3	No atmosphere required	High wear (abrasion, CAI 3–4)	✅ Recommended
Bucket Chain Conveyor	60–90	0.4	L4–L5	Vacuum-compatible; modular	Requires dust prescreening	✅ Recommended
Robotic Arm + Hopper	30–50	0.2 (batch)	All	Precision placement	Limited scalability; maintenance	✅ Recommended (Precision)

Note:

• Screw Conveyors (L1–L3): Enclosed, helical systems housed within abrasion-resistant tubes; magnetic anchoring provides stability in reduced gravity. Ideal for fine, loose regolith.

• Bucket Chain Conveyors (L4–L5): Modular systems employing insulated buckets and low-friction chains for bulk transfer. Proven compatibility with vacuum environments; suitable for denser, coarser regolith.

• Robotic Arms with Hoppers (L1–L5): Precision material placement systems, adapted from existing space robotics. While throughput is limited, these systems provide critical flexibility for stockpile management and localized operations.

• Conveyance distances exceeding 100 meters may require intermediate transfer or booster systems to manage cumulative wear and maintain operational efficiency.

Figure 4.1 presents the provisional conveyance throughput estimates (m³/h) for regolith layers L1 through L5, reflecting anticipated performance ranges for mechanical systems under lunar environmental conditions. These estimates are derived from terrestrial mining and tunneling practices and adapted to account for the lunar vacuum, low gravity, and regolith variability.

Throughput is projected to increase through L2 and L3 due to the transition to more stable, compacted material, peaking at L3 (approximately 100 m³/h) where mechanical flow is optimized. A reduction in throughput is expected for L4 and L5 as material density and cohesion increase, requiring more robust systems with greater frictional resistance. For L1, throughput remains lower due to challenges managing fine particles in low gravity and vacuum, which constrain conveyance velocity and require controlled handling to mitigate dust dispersion.

These values serve as conceptual benchmarks to inform early-stage system sizing and energy planning. They remain subject to validation through lunar-specific testing and operational modeling.

Figure 4.1 - Provisional conveyance throughput by regolith layer (L1–L5), reflecting performance estimates for mechanical systems adapted from terrestrial practices.

Note: The conveyance efficiency values presented in this chart are provisional estimates based on terrestrial pneumatic and belt conveyor systems, adapted for lunar regolith layers L1 L5 using data from Powder & Bulk Solids (2022). These figures assume a 100-meter conveyance distance and rely on simulated lunar conditions, including vacuum and low gravity, without direct lunar field data. Actual efficiencies may vary due to site specific regolith properties, equipment wear, and environmental factors. Users are advised to conduct on site testing and validation prior to operational deployment.

5. Waste Piles and Dumps

   
   

Effective management of waste piles and dumps is essential for lunar spoil handling to ensure long-term stability and minimize operational and environmental risks across the varied regolith layers (L1–L5). Properly engineered storage of spoil is a critical component of sustaining lunar infrastructure development, supporting safe excavation operations, and enabling future resource utilization.

This section examines the types of waste piles, dumps, and heaps applicable to the lunar environment, addressing their geometric configurations, functional applications, and associated risks. Particular attention is given to potential failure modes and the inferred geotechnical properties required to maintain structural integrity under low gravity, vacuum, and extreme thermal cycling.

Given the absence of atmospheric effects and natural compaction processes, waste storage systems must be adapted to lunar constraints through the application of engineered solutions derived from terrestrial mining and civil works, with appropriate modifications to reflect the unique behavior of lunar regolith.

5.1 Types of Waste Piles, Dumps and Heaps

The classification and design of waste piles, dumps, and heaps for lunar operations must account for the unique challenges posed by the physical properties of lunar regolith and the absence of atmospheric support. These engineered structures play a critical role in organizing and managing excavated materials from the L1–L5 stratigraphic layers, each presenting distinct geotechnical considerations related to density, cohesion, and particle behavior in vacuum and low gravity.

On the lunar surface, waste storage systems must be adapted to mitigate the risks of material instability, dust dispersion, and slope failure, while accommodating the operational demands of excavation sequencing and ISRU processes. Proper classification ensures that each type of pile or dump is selected and configured according to its intended function, material characteristics, and site-specific constraints.

The following subsections describe the principal configurations used for waste management, focusing on their geometric design, functional applications, and associated engineering considerations for lunar conditions.

5.1.1 Configurations

Waste pile and dump configurations are fundamental to managing the volume and stability of excavated lunar regolith (Figure 5.1). While these configurations are derived from terrestrial mining practices, their adaptation for lunar conditions requires careful engineering due to the absence of atmospheric pressure, low gravity, and extreme thermal cycling. Understanding these configurations in detail is essential to ensure stability, mitigate dust hazards, and support sustainable surface operations.

The following configurations represent established approaches, each evaluated for its potential applicability to lunar spoil management.

Figure 5.1 - Mine Dumps Configurations. Source: Zahl et al. 1992.

End Dumps

End dumps involve depositing spoil material at the termination point of a transport route, typically by robotic haulers, to form a conical or gently sloped pile. Material spreads outward in a radial pattern as it settles, establishing a stable base through successive layers. While atmospheric pressure aids compaction on Earth, the absence of air on the Moon increases the risk of particle dispersion, requiring controlled dumping techniques to limit dust and maintain pile geometry.

Key Considerations for Lunar Application:

• Controlled placement to mitigate dispersion in vacuum.

• Limitation on pile height governed by material stability, not compaction.

Side Hill Fills

This method utilizes the natural slopes of craters or ridges to extend spoil laterally along contours in compacted, incremental layers. The design creates a terraced effect, distributing the load across the slope. On Earth, atmospheric effects help stabilize these fills; on the Moon, the lack of atmospheric cushioning increases the risk of mass movement, necessitating precise control over layer thickness and compaction.

Key Considerations for Lunar Application:

• Slope angles typically maintained between 1.5H:1V and 2H:1V.

• Enhanced attention to compaction and layering for stability.

Valley Fills

Valley fills exploit natural depressions or terrain lows to contain spoil, forming large, elongated piles stabilized laterally by surrounding topography. Material is placed in compacted lifts, creating a stable mass. While this configuration is ideal for storing high volumes, lunar conditions pose challenges due to the lack of natural consolidation and the risk of subsidence under load, requiring reinforced foundations.

Key Considerations for Lunar Application:

• Suitable for large-scale storage where natural containment exists.

• Requires engineered foundations to prevent settlement.

Terrace Dumps

Terrace dumps create horizontal platforms or terraces along slopes, placing waste in sequential, uniformly graded layers to achieve a stepped profile that limits overextension and distributes load. While this method controls pile geometry effectively, the extreme thermal cycles on the Moon may induce terrace separation, necessitating robust inter-terrace connections and materials capable of withstanding thermal stresses.

Key Considerations for Lunar Application:

• Requires precise grading and stabilization of each terrace.

• Design must account for thermal expansion and contraction.

In the lunar context, the applicability of these waste configurations must be evaluated against environmental constraints, including low gravity, vacuum, and extreme thermal cycling.

• End dumps are well-suited for the flat, loose regolith of the surface layer (0–0.3 m), where the primary concern is maintaining cohesion and minimizing dispersion. The risk of edge collapse due to low cohesion can be mitigated through enhanced compaction and anchoring systems to stabilize the pile perimeter.

• Side hill fills are applicable to deeper layers (3–5 m and beyond) where natural slopes can be exploited. However, the risk of sliding in low-gravity environments requires steeper internal angles and continuous monitoring to ensure stability over time.

• Valley fills are viable where natural depressions exist, particularly for the 1.5–3 m layers. These configurations require reinforced foundations and gradual placement to prevent subsidence and distribute loads evenly.

• Terrace dumps can be adapted for the 0.3–1.5 m layer, where terracing aids in load management. However, the risk of terrace separation due to thermal cycling necessitates regular maintenance and flexible construction techniques to maintain structural integrity.

Among these methods, end dumps and side hill fills offer the most practical solutions for lunar operations, provided that appropriate stability measures are implemented to address vacuum-related dispersion and thermal stresses.

5.1.2 Leach Dumps or Heaps

On Earth, leach dumps or heaps are traditionally employed for ore processing through liquid percolation. However, in the lunar environment, where water and atmospheric conditions are absent, this concept must be adapted for thermal processing applications aimed at extracting volatiles from deeper regolith layers, particularly within the 1.5–3 m (L3) and 3–5 m (L4) horizons.

These lunar heaps would serve as thermal processing piles, where targeted heating is used to liberate volatile compounds such as water ice or other trapped resources for ISRU operations. However, the extreme lunar temperature fluctuations (-173°C to 127°C) introduce significant challenges. Thermal cycling can induce cracking within the pile structure, compromising heap integrity and creating pathways for fine particles to escape into the vacuum, exacerbating dust hazards and operational risks.

Effective management of these structures requires:

• The integration of thermal insulation layers to mitigate temperature extremes,

• The design of controlled heating zones to minimize differential expansion and contraction,

• Engineering measures to maintain structural cohesion throughout processing cycles.

These strategies are critical to preserving the mechanical stability of the heap and ensuring the efficient recovery of resources without contributing to dust dispersion or environmental contamination within the lunar operational zone.

5.1.3 Stockpiles

Stockpiles serve as temporary storage for excavated regolith, particularly from the 0.3–1.5 m (L2) layer, where partially compacted material may be reserved for future processing or use in construction activities. However, the low cohesion of this layer increases the risk of settlement, as the base material may compress unevenly under the weight of accumulated spoil, resulting in uneven surfaces or localized collapse.

A secondary failure mode is edge erosion, where fine particles are mobilized by minor vibrations, thermal expansion, or operational disturbances. In a vacuum environment, these particles may disperse across the surface, contributing to dust hazards and complicating material recovery.

To mitigate these risks, stockpiles should be constructed with broad bases to distribute loads evenly and incorporate regular compaction protocols to enhance structural integrity. Such measures reduce the likelihood of settlement and edge failure, ensuring greater stability and safer retrieval operations during future excavation or processing activities.

5.1.4 Placer Waste and Tailings Deposits

Placer waste and tailings deposits result from regolith processing activities, typically accumulating from the deepest layers (beyond 5 m, L5), where denser, rock-like materials are separated during resource extraction. These deposits present unique stability challenges due to the low friction angle of lunar regolith, which increases the risk of slumping or uncontrolled lateral spreading under their own weight, particularly in the absence of atmospheric stabilization.

Another critical concern is dust mobilization. Fine tailings can become airborne under mechanical disturbance or thermal cycling, even in vacuum conditions, posing risks to equipment functionality and operational safety.

To mitigate these issues, controlled deposition techniques are essential. Recommended strategies include:

• Staged layering to manage the height and distribution of material,

• Containment barriers to enhance cohesion and prevent lateral spread,

• Engineering solutions to maintain pile integrity over time and minimize environmental risks associated with dust dispersion.

These measures ensure that placer waste and tailings remain structurally stable and operationally manageable throughout their lifecycle.

5.2 Impacts of Waste Dumps

The establishment of waste dumps on the lunar surface has significant implications for the operational environment, particularly in terms of land use, visibility, and site planning. These impacts must be carefully considered and managed to support the long-term viability of excavation, construction, and ISRU activities.

Improperly designed or positioned waste dumps can complicate site logistics, reduce usable operational space, obstruct access routes, and interfere with infrastructure layout, particularly in constrained areas near landing zones or habitat modules. Additionally, large waste piles may create visual obstructions that hinder navigation and planning, particularly for autonomous systems relying on line-of-sight or terrain recognition.

Effective waste management strategies must therefore balance operational efficiency with the safe and sustainable integration of dumps into the broader site architecture, ensuring that spoil placement does not undermine future mission phases or infrastructure expansion.

5.2.1 Land Disturbance

The placement of waste dumps disrupts the lunar surface, displacing regolith across all layers and altering the natural terrain. In the surface layer (0–0.3 m), loose material is easily disturbed, creating craters or uneven patches that complicate future excavation or landing sites. Deeper layers (1.5–5 m and beyond) may experience subsidence if underlying material compacts under the dump’s weight, potentially destabilizing adjacent structures. A critical failure mode is surface instability, were displaced regolith shifts during dump construction, risking equipment damage or operational delays. Mitigating this impact requires precise placement planning and monitoring of ground movement to preserve usable land.

5.2.2 Visual Impacts

Waste dumps significantly alter the lunar landscape, creating prominent artificial features that influence operational visibility and site planning. Large accumulations of spoil, particularly those derived from deeper layers (3–5 m and beyond), can obscure critical landmarks, infrastructure, or solar arrays, potentially reducing operational efficiency, especially during daylight-dependent activities.

A notable failure mode associated with waste dumps is the generation of dust plumes during material placement. These plumes disperse fine particles across the operational area, temporarily impairing visibility and creating navigation hazards for both crewed and autonomous systems.

To minimize visual and operational impacts:

• Waste dumps should be strategically located in low-traffic zones or positioned behind natural ridges or terrain features that provide shielding.

• Construction activities should be scheduled to avoid peak operational periods to reduce conflicts with mission-critical activities.

• Placement strategies should preserve clear sightlines and operational zones, ensuring the visual environment remains functional and predictable for ongoing and future missions.

6. Design of Waste Dump

6.1 Slope Stability

Slope stability is a fundamental aspect of waste dump design, governing the structural integrity of spoil piles under the unique conditions of the lunar environment. The absence of atmospheric pressure eliminates natural compaction processes, while the low cohesion of upper regolith layers and increased density at depth introduce complex stability challenges.

Achieving and maintaining stable slope configurations is critical to preventing catastrophic failures that could threaten equipment, infrastructure, and mission objectives. Slope failures may lead to uncontrolled material displacement, loss of access routes, or damage to nearby operational assets.

This subsection examines the primary failure modes relevant to lunar waste dumps and identifies the key factors influencing slope performance, forming the basis for a resilient design strategy adapted to low gravity, vacuum, and thermal extremes.

6.1.1 Potential Failure Modes

The lunar environment amplifies the risks associated with slope stability, requiring a clear understanding of potential failure mechanisms to ensure the integrity of waste dumps. Unique factors such as low gravity, lack of atmospheric pressure, extreme thermal fluctuations, and regolith behavior heighten the likelihood of slope instability if not properly addressed through design.

Figure 6.1 illustrates these principal failure modes. Each is analyzed in detail to support engineering judgment and guide the development of effective mitigation strategies. This analysis is intended to inform design validation processes and reinforce the importance of proactive risk management in lunar waste dump construction.

The following subsections address the technical characteristics and mitigation measures for each failure type, considering both the geotechnical properties of lunar regolith and environmental constraints.

Figure 6.1 - Potential Failure Modes. Adapted from SME Engineering Handbook, 2011.

Surface or Edge Slumping

Surface or edge slumping occurs when the outer margins of a waste dump, particularly within the loose surface layer (0–0.3 m), fail under gravitational forces due to insufficient cohesion. The fine, unconsolidated particles in L1 regolith, with cohesion values typically ranging from 0 to 0.5 kPa, lack the binding strength inherent to terrestrial soils. This condition renders these zones highly susceptible to gradual slumping as the weight of accumulated material exceeds the available frictional resistance at the edges.

Over time, this leads to the formation of unstable overhangs as material slowly creeps outward. These overhangs present a significant hazard, with the potential for sudden collapse under additional loading, thermal cycling, or operational disturbance. Such failures can pose risks to equipment, infrastructure, and access routes essential for ongoing operations. The absence of atmospheric pressure on the Moon, which typically provides stabilizing effects on Earth, further exacerbates this risk.

Mitigation strategies include:

• Maintaining shallower slope angles (e.g., 1.5H:1V or flatter) to reduce edge stress concentrations.

• Conducting regular profiling using robotic graders to redistribute material and eliminate overhangs before they become critical.

• Implementing continuous monitoring through surface sensors capable of detecting early signs of slumping, enabling proactive corrective actions.

Shallow Flow Slides

Shallow flow slides involve the rapid, fluid-like movement of a thin regolith layer, typically within the partially compacted 0.3–1.5 m (L2) zone. These failures are triggered by dynamic forces such as equipment vibrations or thermal expansion and contraction cycles. Under these conditions, fine-grained particles within the layer can temporarily lose interparticle friction, mobilizing as a cohesive mass that flows downslope and erodes the dump’s base.

The failure process is initiated when vibrational energy from machinery or cyclical thermal stresses reduces shear strength, enabling the regolith to behave transiently as a flowing material. This failure mode presents a dual hazard:

• It can undermine the waste dump’s foundation, compromising overall stability and triggering further structural failures.

• It can generate dust clouds in the vacuum environment, which obscure visibility and pose navigation hazards to both equipment and personnel.

  
  

The vacuum conditions on the Moon exacerbate the impact by accelerating dust dispersion, amplifying both operational and safety risks.

Mitigation strategies include:

• Controlled deposition techniques to minimize the accumulation of loosely compacted material prone to mobilization.

• Use of vibration-dampening pads beneath equipment to reduce energy transmission into spoil piles.

• Scheduling construction activities to avoid thermal peak periods, reducing the frequency of expansion-contraction cycles.

• Installation of temporary berms or barriers to redirect potential flow paths and contain displaced material, thereby enhancing long-term stability.

Rotational Circular Failures

Rotational circular failures occur when a significant portion of the waste dump, typically within the denser 1.5–3 m (L3) or 3–5 m (L4) layers, rotates along a curved slip surface due to inadequate shear strength. This failure mode is driven by the cumulative weight of the spoil pile exceeding the bearing resistance of the underlying material, causing the regolith mass to pivot around a circular arc-shaped slip plane.

In these deeper, more compacted layers, where bulk density increases and cohesion typically ranges from 1–2 kPa, the risk arises if the internal friction angle (typically 20°–30°) is insufficient to counteract the imposed loads. When these thresholds are exceeded, rotational failure may occur, leading to the displacement of large volumes of material, which can destabilize the entire waste structure and potentially trigger secondary failures in adjacent areas.

Identification of this failure mode requires detailed geotechnical analysis, including:

• Mapping of potential slip surfaces through site-specific investigations and modeling.

• Slope stability assessments to evaluate critical failure thresholds under lunar gravity and vacuum conditions.

Mitigation strategies include:

• Reinforcing foundations with compacted regolith to disrupt potential slip planes and enhance bearing capacity.

• Maintaining slope angles below critical thresholds, informed by empirical data and analysis.

• Implementing real-time monitoring systems to detect early indicators of rotational movement, allowing for proactive adjustments before failure progresses.

Base Failure

Base failure involves the collapse or subsidence of the waste dump’s foundation, typically occurring within the deepest regolith layers (beyond 5 m, L5), where underlying materials may compress or shift under imposed loads. Although this layer often resembles bedrock with higher density, its stability can vary due to uncompacted zones, voids, or pre-existing fractures.

The weight of the overlying spoil mass, combined with the absence of natural consolidation mechanisms (such as moisture-induced compaction), can lead to foundation subsidence, resulting in widespread settlement that undermines the structural integrity of the entire dump. This failure mode can propagate upward, causing the pile to tilt, deform, or collapse, with potential consequences for adjacent infrastructure, operational areas, and access routes.

The risk of base failure is further heightened under lunar vacuum conditions, where the lack of atmospheric pressure and moisture prevents any natural improvement in foundation strength over time.

Mitigation strategies include:

• Pre-loading the foundation area with incremental material to assess and validate load-bearing capacity.

• Reinforcing the base with densely compacted regolith to improve uniformity and distribute loads more effectively across the foundation footprint.

• Implementing ongoing settlement monitoring using laser-based systems or other precision sensors to detect early signs of subsidence, enabling corrective measures before failures escalate.

6.1.2 Factors Affecting Slope Stability

The stability of waste dump slopes on the Moon is governed by a complex interplay of environmental and material factors, each requiring careful evaluation to achieve a resilient and durable design suited to lunar conditions.

Key Factors Influencing Slope Stability:

1. Site Topography:

   The natural lunar terrain, including craters, ridges, and plains, dictates the optimal placement and orientation of waste dumps. Steep crater walls increase the risk of sliding, while flat areas may promote uncontrolled material spreading. Detailed topographic surveys are essential to identify stable locations and mitigate slope-related risks through site-specific adjustments.

2. Dump Geometry and Stacking Method:

   The shape, height, and layering techniques of waste dumps directly influence load distribution and stability. Steeper slopes or irregular stacking can concentrate stress and increase failure risk, while systematic, incremental layering at controlled angles (e.g., 1.5H:1V) enhances stability. The low cohesion of regolith requires careful management through incremental placement and compaction.

3. Geotechnical Properties of Mine Waste:

   The physical properties of the regolith, including cohesion (0–0.5 kPa in L1 to 1–2 kPa in deeper layers) and friction angle (20°–30°), dictate its resistance to movement. Upper layers with low cohesion are prone to slumping, while denser lower layers may resist shear but remain susceptible to rotational failures. These properties demand tailored design responses.

4. Geotechnical Properties of the Foundation:

   The load-bearing capacity of the foundation depends on the density and compaction of deeper regolith. Weak or uncompacted zones increase the risk of subsidence, requiring pre-construction compaction and load testing to verify stability before waste placement.

5. Seismic Forces:

   While lunar seismic activity is limited compared to Earth, microseismic events from meteorite impacts or equipment operations can generate vibrations capable of triggering slope failures. Dumps must be designed with vibration-resistant profiles, including wider bases and reinforced perimeters to absorb and dissipate energy.

Integrated Design Considerations:

These factors collectively demand a rigorous, integrated methodology for stable slope design. This includes:

• Detailed topographic analysis to map craters, ridges, and plains, leveraging high-resolution data to select optimal dump sites that minimize instability while maximizing operational efficiency.

• Comprehensive material testing through in-situ sampling and laboratory simulations to quantify cohesion, friction angle, and density across the L1–L5 layers, informing design thresholds for load-bearing capacity and failure resistance.

• Dynamic load assessments to account for cumulative stresses imposed by construction activities, equipment operations, and thermal cycling.

• Real-time monitoring systems to adapt designs to evolving conditions and verify performance against expectations.

This data-driven, adaptive engineering approach ensures that slope stability is not only maintained but optimized, safeguarding the structural integrity of waste dumps against the Moon’s unique environmental challenges.

7. Conclusions and Recommendations

This analysis of waste pile and dump management for lunar excavations underscores the critical need for engineered purpose-built solutions that directly address the unique environmental and geotechnical demands of the Moon. The variability across the lunar regolith profile, from the loose surface layers (0–0.3 m) to the dense, bedrock-like strata beyond 5 m, presents a spectrum of challenges: low cohesion, extreme thermal fluctuations, and the absence of atmospheric pressure all contribute to operational risks that terrestrial practices cannot fully mitigate without adaptation.

Preliminary assessments indicate that configurations such as end dumps and side hill fills offer practical frameworks for spoil storage when implemented with controlled deposition techniques and slope stabilization measures tailored to lunar gravity and vacuum conditions. However, this study highlights key failure modes, surface slumping, shallow flow slides, rotational circular failures, and base subsidence, that expose the vulnerability of these structures to the Moon’s harsh environment. Inferred design baselines, such as minimum compressive strength of 60 kPa, internal friction angles of no less than 40°, and dust retention efficiencies exceeding 95%, provide provisional guidance but remain untested under true lunar conditions and must be treated with appropriate caution.

The stability of lunar waste dumps demands a methodical, data-driven design approach integrating topographic assessment, detailed material characterization, and dynamic load management. Variations in lunar topography require site-specific strategies: flat areas demand enhanced compaction to prevent lateral dispersion, while slopes necessitate reinforced foundations to counter potential sliding. The depth-dependent geotechnical properties of regolith necessitate layered construction techniques that account for the low cohesion of upper strata and potential subsidence in deeper horizons. Although seismic forces on the Moon are minimal, vibration-resistant profiles remain prudent to mitigate risks posed by equipment operations and microseismic events.

The broader objective of this work is to advance the conversation beyond abstract theory and toward a design-oriented mindset, offering practical, scalable frameworks informed by terrestrial best practices, adapted thoughtfully for lunar conditions. These recommendations serve as a tentative but necessary step toward establishing operational baselines for future missions.

Recommendations for Implementation:

1. Conduct comprehensive field trials on the lunar surface to validate the proposed compressive strength and friction angle thresholds, employing robotic systems to simulate dump construction and monitor real-time slope behavior and settlement trends.

2. Implement rigorous site preparation protocols, including pre-loading and compaction of foundations, to improve load-bearing capacity and reduce the risk of subsidence, particularly within the 1.5–5 m layers.

3. Establish continuous monitoring systems utilizing laser-based sensors and vibration detectors to track slope stability, thermal effects, and dust behavior, enabling proactive adjustments to mitigate emerging risks.

4. Develop standardized construction protocols for end dumps and side hill fills, with prescribed layering sequences and slope geometries (e.g., 1.5H:1V) to optimize stability across varying regolith conditions.

5. Invest in long-term research focused on thermal-resistant materials, advanced dust containment strategies, and adaptive structural solutions, ensuring future designs evolve based on empirical data and operational feedback.

References

1. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME). (2011). SME Mining Engineering Handbook (3rd ed., Vols. 1–2). P. Darling (Ed.). SME, Englewood, CO.

2. Moraes, R. (2025). The Moon Builders: Practical Approaches for Overcoming the Early Challenges in Lunar Construction. Amazon KDP, Self-published. ISBN 979-8-287-39723-4.

3. International Tunnelling and Underground Space Association (ITA). (2022). Mechanized tunnelling (Report No. 26, Task Group 4). ITA. https://www.ita-aites.org/ ISBN 978-2-9701436-1-1.

4. Zahl, E. G., Biggs, F., Boldt, C. M., E, C. R., Gertsch, L., H, L. R., et al. (1992). Waste

   disposal and contaminant control. In H. L. Hartman, SME Mining Engineering

   Handbook (pp. 1170-1171). Colorado: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and

   Exploration, Inc.